Monday, 29 October 2012

ARTICLE 5 SUMMARY

ARTICLE 5 SUMMARY

Abe, T., Kawakami, Y., Sugita, M., & Fukunaga, T. (1997). Relationship between training frequency and subcutaneous and visceral fat in women. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 29(12), 1549-1553.

·         Twenty-six  healthy women with sedentary lifestyles ( defined as less than 30min a day, 1 day a week) were randomly assigned to three groups:
1.       Control group – changed nothing
2.       Group that performed aerobic exercise 1-2 sessions/week and restricted calorie program
 (-200 cal from current intake)
3.       Group that performed aerobic exercise 3-4/week and maintaining current caloric intake
·         Training programs lasted 13 weeks. Aerobic activity consisted of stationary cycling with intensity set at 50-60% of maximal heart rate
·         Weight was measured using hydrostatic weighing technique
·         Visceral vs. Subcutaneous fat was measured using B-mode ultrasonography
·         Results
-          Average energy cost of each training session ranged from 150 to 220 calories
-          Approx weekly caloric deficits were 1960 cal/week
-          Reduction in total body weight, body fat % and total fat mass following training was significant for both Groups 2 & 3.
-          Group 3 showed no training induced differences in Visceral fat
-          Subcutaneus fat was significantly reduced in Groups 3 but not Group 2.
-          Group 2 exercised less and had less change in subcutaneous fat, there was a significant loss in visceral fat.
-          Group 3 exercised more with less diet restriction and lost more subcutaneous fat than visceral fat but both losses were significant.
·         Findings
-          Decrease in subcutaneous fat (but not visceral) is proportional to the amount of aerobic exercise training whereas Visceral fat appears to be related more to a caloric deficit.

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Birthday Post

Hey Internet People

Today is my birthday and marks my 27th year which I have deemed the year of Amanda (THE SUMMER OF GEORGE!....no?...no Seinfeld watchers here? Oh well). Which means tomorrow starts my journey of putting what I've read so far into practice.

As of today - Paco (my giant Buddah belly) measures 55 inches in circumference. I had a WTF moment and didn't believe it - I re-measured twice more to confirm. I walked 7km last night - I wonder howmuch bigger he would be if I didn't walk? hrrmmmmm

I know for many of you this blog is moving a little slow but I am doing my best to keep up with life (work, family, sanity, etc) and still read these academic articles. Take a beak and check back every week or so and see what's new. I'm averaging just over 100 views a day and feel bad when I don't get around to posting.

Have fun and make good choices,

Amanda

ARTICLE #4 SUMMARY

ARTICLE #4 SUMMARY
Abdominal fat and what to do about it. (2006). Harvard Women's Health Watch, 14(4), 1-3.
NOTE: This was very much so an "overview" article and I don't think I will make guidelines from it until I get to review the original research referenced (which is included in the reference list of this blog to be reviewed)
Intro
·         As women age, their proportion of to body weight tends to increase (especially during menopause)
·         Visceral fat has been linked to metabolic disturbances, increased risk of cardiovascular disease, higher LDL (bad) cholesterol and Type 2 diabetes
·         In women, visceral fat has been linked to breast cancer, colorectal cancer  and the need for gallbladder surgery
·         Fat accumulated in pear-shaped women (weight carried in lower half) is subcutaneous fat while those with apple shaped bodies (weight carried in middle) is largely visceral.
Common causes of abdominal fat in women:
·         Heredity (genetics) can influence your shape. A number of genes have been identified that determine how many fat cells an individual has and where their fat gets stored
·         Hormones are also a big player
o   lowered estrogen can lead to increased abdominal fat after menopause
o   menopause can also lead to an increase of cortisol, the stress hormone that promotes the accumulation of abdominal fat
·         There is much evidence that waist circumference is a better predictor of health problems than BMI
Our fat is not lazy
·         Abdominal fat is biologically active and should be thought of as an endocrine organ/gland that produces hormones than just a storage area
·         Fat releases leptin (hormone that lowers appetite) after meals
·         Fat releases adiponectin (chemical that affects your body’s response to insulin)
·         Excess body fat disrupts the normal balance and functioning of these hormones
·         One reason visceral fat is so harmful is because of its location near the portal vein (vein that carries blood from the intestinal area to the liver)
What can we do about visceral fat?
·         What works
o   At least 30 min of physical activity a day - Duke University Medical Center study shows - non-exercisers experienced nearly 9% gain in visceral fat after 6 months compared to those who walked/jogged the equivalent of 12 miles per week who put on no visceral fat
o   Strength training – study where experimental group received 1 hour of strength training 2x a week reduced total body fat by nearly 4%

·         What doesn’t work
o   Spot exercising – sit-ups, etc tighten ab muscles but will nto get at visceral fat
o   Drastically reducing calorie intake – puts body into starvation mode
o   DHEA – hormone that declines with age. A two year randomized trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that the hormone had ZERO effect on aging markers (including body composition) in men and women aged 60+

·         Drug treatments
o   Meridia – drug’s greatest effects are on visceral fat
o   Acomplia – not yet FDA approved – new class of drug that blocks brain receptor that increases appetite and has been shown to modestly reduce storage of fat on the waist

Sunday, 21 October 2012

Guideline 1

1. Eat the majority of your daily carbohydrates at dinner (Article 3)

ARTICLE #3 SUMMARY

ARTICLE #3 SUMMARY

Sofer, S., Eliraz, A., Kaplan, S., Voet, H., Fink, G., Kima, T., & Madar, Z. (2011). Greater weight loss and hormonal changes after 6 months diet with carbohydrates eaten mostly at dinner. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 19(10), 2006-14

·         Study investigated the effect of a low-calorie diet with carbs eaten mostly at dinner on anthropometric (weight and measurement of the body) , hunger/satiety, biochemical and inflammatory parameters. They also measured hormonal secretions.

·       This was randomized clinical trial with random blind group assignment and inclusion of a control group. However, the participants were not chosen at random but included only healthy obese male and female police officers (BMI over 30 but do not have hypertension, diabetes, etc). The analysis used was appropriate (T-test, Anova, and they controlled for bias with analysis of covariance, etc). Hormone levels were taken and hunger questionnaires were completed every 4 hours before meals on days 7, 90 and 180 of the diets)

·         The study built upon previous research that showed the patterns of the following bodily secretions:

ü  Leptin is the “satiety hormone” that regulates hunger, satiety and food intake. Our bodies increase its secretion between 1600hrs (4pm) and 0100 (1am) – meaning its levels are highest by dinner time and highest while we are usually asleep.

ü  Adiponectin is a protein that regulates energy and lipid / carb metabolism (which reduces serum glucose/lipids – improving insulin sensitivity and having an anti inflammatory effect). This protein in obese individuals is found to be low throughout the day.

·         Researchers are testing to see if an innovative dietary regimen could work with the obese persons body and be beneficial in aiding obesity. Similar studies examining the Muslim Ramadan diet were discussed (when they fast all day and eat a carbohydrate rich evening meal). They hypothesized that holding out carbs until dinner will alter the secretion of these hormones into a new schedule that is higher during the day when the majority of calories are consumed (making people feel less hungry and more satisfied).

·         THE DIET: Standard low calorie diet – 20% protein, 30-35% fat, 45-50% carbohydrates = 1,300 – 1,500 calories daily. (I cannot post the example of their daily food intake from the study because of copyright law)

·         The control group and experimental group ate the EXACT same foods, the only difference being the time of day in which carbs were eaten. Control group contained their carbs throughout the day with every meal and the experimental ate theirs at dinner.

·          BODY MEASUREMENT RESULTS:

ü  Significantly greater weight loss was found in the experimental group (11.6 vs 9.06kg) – (P=0.024)

ü  Trends of greater BMI reduction were found (3.99 vs. 3.16 BMI points), abdominal circumference reduction (11.7 vs. 9.39 cm) and absolute body fat percent (6.98 vs. 5.13%) were found in the experimental group. After controlling for baseline measurements, these results were not scientifically significant (P=>0.05) but still noteworthy.

·         HUNGER/SATIETY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS

ü  HUNGER: Control group felt significantly hungrier at noon on day 90 and 180 compared to first week on diet (5.9%); experimental group felt less hungry compared to the first week (27.7%) on diet. The most significant difference (P=0.03) between the groups with hunger was found in the evening of day 180 (28% increase in hunger vs. 6.6% decrease in hunger).

ü  URGE TO EAT: Experimental diet participants had a 67% reduction in the urge to eat vs. 19% of the control diet group when comparing to the first week of the diet.

ü  PREOCCUPATION WITH THOUGHTS OF FOOD: Experimental group had no increase preoccupation with thoughts of food vs. 33% of the control group having increased preoccupation with thoughts of food on day 180 compared to the first week on diet.

·         BIOCHEMICAL RESULTS

ü  Day 180 on the experimental diet showed significantly lower average daily insulin concentrations when compared to baseline and control group (68%, P=<0.05)

ü  Experimental diet led to significant decrease (20%, P=0.01) in fasting glucose vs. 8.3% decrease in the control group

ü  HOMA (method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta-cell function) 30.9% decrease found in experimental group vs. 19.7% increase in the control group. These results were significant at P=0.015.

ü  Both diets led to significant reduction in morning fasting triglyceride concentrations compared to baseline when measured on days 90 and 180 (P=0.0001).

ü  Experimental diet led to 8.1% significant decrease in total cholesterol concentrations (P=0.01)

ü  HDL-cholesterol (good cholesterol) increase in experimental diet  was significantly greater compared to the control diet increase after 180 days (P=0.022)

·         SERUM INFLAMMATORY LEVELS

ü  Experimental diet had greater CRP reduction (protein found in the blood that rises in response to inflammation) although not scientifically significant once adjusting for baseline levels

ü  Experimental diet had significantly lower TNF-a concentrations (small cell-signaling protein molecules that stimulate an increase or decrease in plasma concentrations in response to inflammation). Experimental diet led to a 9.2% decrease in TNFa levels va. The control group had a 16.1% increase compared to baseline.

·         SERUM HORMONAL LEVELS

ü  Both diets led to an average 12-hours leptin concentrations on day 90 and 180 (P=<0.05)
üExperimental diet led to significant increase (43.5%, P=<0.05) in average 12-h adiponectin (regulates glucose levels and fatty acid breakdown) concentrations vs. the control diets insignificant 13.9% after 180 days.

Friday, 19 October 2012

Updated Reference List now Posted

Happy Friday Reddit and random internet people,

From the updated search strategy, I have removed duplicates and updated the reference list. There are now a total of 556 titles. Lots of reading :) I should have a few more summaries up by tonight.

Have a great weekend. Be safe and make good choices.

Amanda

Thursday, 18 October 2012

Captain's Log - 18 Oct 2012

Tonight, I DID NOT feel like working out. It's rainy, I'm tired and on my lady time (TMI, sorry) All I wanted to do was curl up with a blanket, a book and some chocolate but I knew my Uncle would be disapointed if I didn't go walking with him (I'd have to put $1 in the "fail jar"). So I went...out in the drizzle...and walked eight 0.5km laps and them he let me off the hook because I looked miserable (we usually do 12-14 laps - 6-7km). I just feel bad for copping out early and trying to justify it to myself.

Anyway, I like muffins and have been eating a lot of them lately. I call them "breakfast cakes" and they are delicious. So many delicious calories. I also took a picture of my dinner tonight so you can get a feel of what I eat for my supper meal:

Porkchop, mashed potatoes and mixed veggies:

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

This is me...



Hey there. My name is Amanda and I am a medical/health services librarian.

A little about me:

Educational Background:
     Diploma: Paralegal
     Honours B.A. Criminology (Law)
     Masters of Library and Information Science

Physical Characteristics:
      Sex: Female
      Age: 27
     Heaviest Weight: 365 pounds
     Lightest Weight: 221 pounds
     Height: 5'9

Favourites and stuff:
     Favourite Colour: Green
     Hobbies: Reading, knitting, watching movies, walking/hiking, napping
     Favourite Food: Pizza, Tacos, Potatoes
     Weaknesses: Chocolate, Iced Coffee
     Favourite shows: Gravity Falls, Bob's Burgers, Community